| Academic Year |
2026Year |
School/Graduate School |
Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences (Master's Course) Division of Humanities and Social Sciences International Economic Development Program |
| Lecture Code |
WMHA0059 |
Subject Classification |
Specialized Education |
| Subject Name |
Special Study (October 2026 Master's Students) |
Subject Name (Katakana) |
トクベツケンキュウ |
Subject Name in English |
Special Study (October 2026 Master's Students) |
| Instructor |
CHEN SHUNING |
Instructor (Katakana) |
チン シュウニン |
| Campus |
Higashi-Hiroshima |
Semester/Term |
1st-Year, Second Semester, Year |
| Days, Periods, and Classrooms |
(Year) Inte |
| Lesson Style |
Seminar |
Lesson Style (More Details) |
Face-to-face |
| |
| Credits |
4.0 |
Class Hours/Week |
|
Language of Instruction |
E
:
English |
| Course Level |
7
:
Graduate Special Studies
|
| Course Area(Area) |
24
:
Social Sciences |
| Course Area(Discipline) |
03
:
Economics |
| Eligible Students |
|
| Keywords |
|
| Special Subject for Teacher Education |
|
Special Subject |
|
Class Status within Educational Program (Applicable only to targeted subjects for undergraduate students) | |
|---|
Criterion referenced Evaluation (Applicable only to targeted subjects for undergraduate students) | |
Class Objectives /Class Outline |
Identify research gaps and formulate a focused research question in international economic development. Critically evaluate published research (theory, identification, data, measurement, and validity). Design a feasible research plan (conceptual framework, empirical strategy, and data plan). Present and defend research ideas clearly in oral and written formats. Produce a polished research proposal or a substantial draft section suitable for a master’s thesis trajectory. |
| Class Schedule |
Week1 Orientation: seminar rules, expectations, research ethics; topic mapping Week2 How to read papers efficiently; writing a critique memo (template training) Week3 Literature search strategy; building a bibliography; identifying gaps Week4 Paper Presentation 1 (student-led) + critique workshop Week5 Paper Presentation 2 (student-led) + measurement/data discussion Week6 Identification strategies in applied development research (overview) Week7 Research Question Clinic: each student presents a 3-minute pitch + feedback Week8 Research Design Workshop: conceptual framework + hypotheses Week9 Data Plan Workshop: data sources, feasibility, variables, limitations Week10 Methods Clinic: empirical strategy/estimation plan (or qualitative strategy) Week11 Progress Presentation 1: proposal draft + peer review Week12 Academic writing workshop: structure, argumentation, tables/figures Week13 Progress Presentation 2: revised design + expected contribution Week14 Final Presentation (conference-style) Week15 Final submission and reflection; planning for the next semester and thesis milestones |
Text/Reference Books,etc. |
Textbook (Required): Gertler, P., Martinez, S., Rawlings, L. B., Premand, P., & Vermeersch, C. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice (2nd ed.). Reference Books (Recommended): 1. Causal inference / applied econometrics Cunningham, S. (2021). Causal Inference: The Mixtape. 2. Input–Output / MRIO / GVC analysis Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (2nd ed.). (Optional, if you explicitly teach MRIO/GVC decomposition) Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2014). “Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports.” (AER) 3. Environmental & economic accounting / sustainability United Nations (2021). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). (Optional, broader sustainability indicator perspective) Dasgupta, P. (2021). The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. |
PC or AV used in Class,etc. |
|
| (More Details) |
|
| Learning techniques to be incorporated |
|
Suggestions on Preparation and Review |
Students should read the assigned materials in advance, write a short memo (summary and critique), and come to class ready to discuss questions and limitations. After each session, students should review feedback, refine their notes, and incorporate lessons learned into their research plan or proposal draft. |
| Requirements |
|
| Grading Method |
Grades are based on (i) consistent preparation and active participation, (ii) quality of weekly reading memos demonstrating accurate understanding and critical evaluation, (iii) presentation performance including logical structure and defensible responses to questions, and (iv) the quality of the final research proposal or draft section in terms of originality, feasibility, methodological coherence, and academic writing. |
| Practical Experience |
|
| Summary of Practical Experience and Class Contents based on it |
|
| Message |
|
| Other |
|
Please fill in the class improvement questionnaire which is carried out on all classes. Instructors will reflect on your feedback and utilize the information for improving their teaching. |