Hiroshima University Syllabus

Back to syllabus main page
Japanese
Academic Year 2024Year School/Graduate School Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences (Professional degree course) Division of Professional Development for Teachers and School Leaders Professional Development Program for Teachers and School Leaders
Lecture Code WPA30056 Subject Classification Specialized Education
Subject Name 授業開発と評価(応用)
Subject Name
(Katakana)
 
Subject Name in
English
Lesson Development and Evaluation (Application)
Instructor IKEDA SATOSHI
Instructor
(Katakana)
イケダ サトシ
Campus Higashi-Hiroshima Semester/Term 1st-Year,  Second Semester,  Second Semester
Days, Periods, and Classrooms (2nd) Tues9-10:Faculty Office
Lesson Style Seminar Lesson Style
(More Details)
 
Lecture- and Exercise-oriented, Discussions, Student presentations 
Credits 2.0 Class Hours/Week   Language of Instruction J : Japanese
Course Level 6 : Graduate Advanced
Course Area(Area) 24 : Social Sciences
Course Area(Discipline) 08 : Curriculum and Instruction Sciences
Eligible Students
Keywords SDG_4 
Special Subject for Teacher Education   Special Subject  
Class Status
within Educational
Program
(Applicable only to targeted subjects for undergraduate students)
 
Criterion referenced
Evaluation
(Applicable only to targeted subjects for undergraduate students)
 
Class Objectives
/Class Outline
To develop practical abilities based on understanding of evaluation.
Based on the concept of class development at elementary, junior high and high schools, students will improve practical skills through activities including class analysis, class evaluation, teaching material development, and deme-lessons. 
Class Schedule lesson1
Orientation
lesson2
Current status of evaluation 1: theory
lesson3
Current status of evaluation 2 : practice
lesson4
Class design-based evaluation 1: learning discipline and understanding of reality (group)
lesson5
Class design-based evaluation 2: teaching material analysis (group)
lesson6
Class design-based evaluation 3: analysis and evaluation of classes (group)
lesson7
Class design-based evaluation 4: making lesson plans (group)
lesson8
Class design-based evaluation 5: questions (group)
lesson9
Class design-based evaluation 6: usage of blackboards (group)
lesson10
Class design-based evaluation 7: teachers' rounds in class (group)
lesson11
Plan for demo lesson based on evaluation (group)
lesson12
Implementation of demo lesson based on evaluation (group)
lesson13
Review of demo lesson based on evaluation (group)
lesson14
Evaluation and improvement of demo lesson based on evaluation (group)
lesson15
Wrap-up 
Text/Reference
Books,etc.
Not yet decided 
PC or AV used in
Class,etc.
 
(More Details) Handouts 
Learning techniques to be incorporated  
Suggestions on
Preparation and
Review
Clarify the research theme. 
Requirements  
Grading Method Students will be evaluated comprehensively based on the items listed below
Class participation: 40%
Reports: 60%
(Graduate students with in-service teacher)
To be able to critique the active learning of pupils in classes conducted by other graduate students, and to indicate measures for improvement.
(Graduate students with undergraduate degrees) 
To be able to examine the methods used to generate active learning among students and their effects on the classes conducted in AR field research. 
Practical Experience Experienced  
Summary of Practical Experience and Class Contents based on it Lecturer who have seven years of experience as art teachers at public schools will give lectures and practices. 
Message  
Other   
Please fill in the class improvement questionnaire which is carried out on all classes.
Instructors will reflect on your feedback and utilize the information for improving their teaching. 
Back to syllabus main page