Academic Year |
2024Year |
School/Graduate School |
Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences (Master's Course) Division of Educational Sciences Educational Studies Program |
Lecture Code |
WNC47050 |
Subject Classification |
Specialized Education |
Subject Name |
大学教育論 |
Subject Name (Katakana) |
|
Subject Name in English |
Teaching in Higher Education |
Instructor |
SAKURAI YUSUKE |
Instructor (Katakana) |
サクライ ユウスケ |
Campus |
Higashi-Hiroshima |
Semester/Term |
1st-Year, Second Semester, Second Semester |
Days, Periods, and Classrooms |
(2nd) Mon3-4 |
Lesson Style |
Lecture |
Lesson Style (More Details) |
|
Student presentations, discussion (in Japanese); The details of the course schedule are presented in Week 1. |
Credits |
2.0 |
Class Hours/Week |
|
Language of Instruction |
B
:
Japanese/English |
Course Level |
6
:
Graduate Advanced
|
Course Area(Area) |
24
:
Social Sciences |
Course Area(Discipline) |
07
:
Education |
Eligible Students |
Higher Education |
Keywords |
University Learning and Teaching, International Education, International Student Education, Higher Education, Early Career Researchers, Foreigners |
Special Subject for Teacher Education |
|
Special Subject |
|
Class Status within Educational Program (Applicable only to targeted subjects for undergraduate students) | |
---|
Criterion referenced Evaluation (Applicable only to targeted subjects for undergraduate students) | |
Class Objectives /Class Outline |
On the successful completion of this course, students will be able to: + [Knowledge] talk about some major issues of university teaching and learning which are of their interest and discuss two to three different research analytical methods. + [Skills] present the main issues of academic topics in a clear manner and engage in constructive discussion with others based on appropriate evidence. + [Attitude] recognise the importance of academic manner, such as presenting evidence, referring to original sources and properly citing sources. |
Class Schedule |
1) Guidance (about the confirmation of participants, individual interests, assignments, evaluation) 2) Empirical research: What is research in the social sciences? 3) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 1) 4) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 2) 5) Empirical research: Theoretical framework 6) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 3) 7) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 4) 8) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 5) 9) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 6) 10) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 7) 11) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 8) 12) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 9) 13) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 10) 14) Presentation of key points of papers, comments, and discussion 11) 15) Summary: Envisioning your future |
Text/Reference Books,etc. |
There will be no textbook; students should download the course materials from Moodle. |
PC or AV used in Class,etc. |
|
(More Details) |
|
Learning techniques to be incorporated |
|
Suggestions on Preparation and Review |
Weekly presentations should summarise main research findings, arguments and methods of an assigned research article. The presentation should also introduce an overview of relevant previous studies laid out in the article and its major contributions in the literature. As for commentators, you should "challenge" the article. Specifically, s/he is encouraged to comment on significances/values, research problems and future possibilities that are not mentioned in the article. You should draw on your expertise and interests in your discussion. Both reporters and commentators are expected to pose any questions or unclear points for class discussion. |
Requirements |
This course is designed to help you develop your skills to proactively facilitate and coordinate group discussion. Since presentations should be short but concise, adequate preparation is essential for others to understand your presentation. If you must be absent on the day of your assigned presentation, please notify us immediately, and if possible, find a peer who can replace your turns. |
Grading Method |
## Performance as a presenter or commentator (35%): The evaluation considers the clarity and comprehensiveness in your reporting of the content of an assigned article (e.g., the manner of your presentation using handouts, the coherence of your discussion and your communication during discussion). ## Contribution to the discussion (15%): This course evaluates your contribution to the discussion as a discussion participant. ## Critical review essay (50%): The course participants write a 10,000 word (or 4500 words in English) critical review essay on one paper you have presented or commented on in the course. You will summarise the key points of the article and then comment on problems, significance and advantages of the article. The 35% mark will be assigned to the quality of your discussion and 15% will be assigned to the appropriateness of format as an academic essay. |
Practical Experience |
|
Summary of Practical Experience and Class Contents based on it |
|
Message |
The details of the course schedule are presented in Week 1. |
Other |
|
Please fill in the class improvement questionnaire which is carried out on all classes. Instructors will reflect on your feedback and utilize the information for improving their teaching. |